LYMC
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 2002
Christine
Inglis
MANAGING
AGENT
Following
resignations and replacement of DGA personnel this year some elements of
the service on site did not meet our expectations.
As
a result of this, the Board
-
drew
up a schedule of our expectations of a managing agent
-
asked
for the representative to be replaced
-
asked
DGA for a reduction in fees for this year and
-
wrote
to several other managing agents to check what they could do for us.
Not all replies have been received and they will be the subject of
a meeting in February.
However,
we are pleased to report that:
-
since
Nigel Golder assumed direct responsibility for London Yard,
matters have much improved
-
Howard
Weinstein has recently been appointed to take care of the Yard and is
actively addressing the problems he has inherited.
Howard is part of Woods, another firm in the group including DGA
and the contract will be reassigned at the beginning of the financial
year.
-
DGA
has agreed to reduce the charges for this year by 10%
COMMUNICATION
Shareholders first approach in case of problems
should be made to the managing agent and in the minutes will be full
details of telephone numbers and email and postal addresses of the
managing agent.
If no response is received by all means drop a note
through the door of a director who will then take up the matter for you
SECURITY
Following
problems reported at the last AGM, quotes were taken from a number of
security firms and a committee appointed to interview 4 prospective
suppliers. Interviews were
held with the tendering company and the guards they were proposing to
assign to us. Alamo was appointed and immediate improvements were noted in
visibility and efficiency of the new guard.
There have been some changes to personnel, initially because
Augustine could earn more elswewhere, and there is a possibility of his
coming back to us, but no
problems have been reported recently.
We
invited a Met Police officer to visit the Yard in June and he walked
around the site with several
residents to give advice on security.
The Board supported and actioned his recommendations including
trimming foliage and increasing lighting.
Additional lights are still to be erected.
CCTV
provision was thoroughly investigated and rejected mainly for reasons of
cost and the Met Police advice that CCTV is not wonderfully effective.
SATELLITE TV
This
has been an item on the agenda of most board meetings this year.
The problem is a nutshell is:
1.
Many
yarders feel that provision of satellite TV is necessary to bring London
Yard up to date and to enhance value of the properties.
2.
Erection
of dishes on the walls is against the terms of the lease and is an
eyesore.
3.
The
referendum of shareholders showed the majority to be against installation
of communal satellite tv, mainly because of cost.
4.
The
Board were under the impression until very recently that this fell into
“unnecessary” expenditure, requiring 100% agreement of owners.
However
recent legal advice is that dishes are aerials and aerials are deemed a necessity that is within the Board’s
remit to update and replace.
5.
As
many “no” voters indicated that it was a cost issue, more quotations
were sent for. One of the
respondents, Nick Simpson of Community Vision, a company that has supplied
communal satellite dishes to other complexes on the island, attended the
December Board meeting to explain what he could do for us.
6.
The
cost would be c£180 per unit, this and the logistics of installation are
still under discussion and will be reported to shareholders when and if
the Board feel that it is viable.
MISCELLANEOUS
The
Board wishes to thank Simon Hollingworth for producing an extensive
maintenance list with photographs which DGA has added to the
ongoing maintenance schedule.
|